We use timestamped, source-linked evidence from multiple sources to compress ambiguity
The assembly engine for high-stakes arbitration and risk. We don't make the decisions—your experts do. We just provide the most rigorous way to assemble, trace, and review multi-format chronological data.
Chronological Navigation
Use the slider to trace the fault lines of treaties, markets, and sovereignty.
2026-01-15
Art. 5 Clarification
2026-01-18
ICC FPIC Statement
2026-01-20
US Strategic Declaration
2026-01-25
OFAC Arctic Extension
2026-01-28
China REE Controls
2026-02-01
EU Battery Reg Notice
2026-02-05
EU Shipping Ban
2026-02-08
Arctic Council Framework
2026-02-10
CBAM Expansion
2026-02-12
Greenland Rights Assertion
2026-02-15
Danish Sovereignty Statement
2026-02-18
EU Arctic Policy
12 catalysts in selected range · Generate Time Pack
The Assembly Flow
From Document Chaos to Structured Evidence
Six steps to transform scattered materials into traceable, timestamped chronologies ready for memorials, pleadings, and cross-examination.
Ingest
Aggregate multi-format data—documents, links, and analyst notes—into a single secure environment.
Extract & Normalize
Automatically structure dates, entities, and conflicting assertions for expert review.
Chronology Builder
Assemble sortable timelines where every single row is anchored to a verified citation.
Evidence Mapping
Map every claim to its original source and excerpt. Traceability is never broken.
Provenance & Audit
A complete log of who changed what and why. Built for rigorous internal review workflows.
Multi-Format Export
Generate review-ready packs (PDF/Word/CSV) and 'Opposing Counsel Checklists' to stress-test your position.
The Challenge
High-Stakes Disputes Demand Structured Evidence
When treaty obligations, regulatory regimes, and contemporaneous records interact, disputes teams need more than summaries—they need exact text, timestamps, and provenance.
Memorials Lack Traceability
When assertions in pleadings can't be traced to source documents, opposing counsel exploits the gap. Every claim needs an evidence chain.
Chronologies Are Manual
Building timelines from document production is error-prone and time-intensive. Miss one date, and the narrative unravels.
Contradictions Go Unnoticed
Witness statements, regulatory filings, and contemporaneous notes often conflict. Finding those contradictions before cross-examination is critical.
Audit Trails Are Incomplete
What was known when? Who reviewed what? Decision logs and change histories are essential for quantum experts and risk teams.
Our Philosophy
Assembly over Answers
"Don't fight the data. Master the assembly."
Transform scattered materials into structured, traceable evidence your team can rely on.
"Your experts provide the judgment. We provide the provenance."
Expert-in-the-loop infrastructure that supports—never replaces—human decision-making.
"Multi-format chronologies that stand up to the most aggressive cross-examination."
Every row anchored to a citation. Every claim linked to its source. Full traceability.
The Solution: Expert-in-the-Loop Infrastructure
Greenland Assurance transforms scattered documents into chronologies, evidence maps, and exportable bundles—designed to support memorials, witness preparation, and cross-examination.
Intelligence Reports
Automated Evidence Monitoring
Reports designed to support disputes teams—archived, timestamped, searchable at clause level, and exportable in formats suited for memorials and exhibits.
Auditable Archives
Time Packs: Proof That Rules Moved
Immutable bundles of exact texts, hashes, and timestamps—designed so disputes teams, experts, and reviewers can trace every assertion to its source.
Export Formats
Hashed PDFs
Review-ready documentation
NDJSON Feeds
Machine-readable data
Exhibit Templates
Memorial and pleading formats
All packs include SHA-256 verification hashes and immutable timestamps for provenance tracking.
Quantified Intelligence
Evidence Gravity Scores
Our scoring engine links exact clauses across frameworks, measures contradiction intensity, and tracks funding and sanction catalysts to assign each scenario transparent, auditable, and exportable scores.
- —Links exact clauses across frameworks
- —Measures contradiction intensity in real-time
- —Tracks funding and sanction catalysts
- —Transparent methodology, fully auditable
Composite Gravity Score
Sample: NATO Article 5 + Greenland Self-Government
Probability of scenario occurrence
Magnitude of market/legal effect
Framework conflict intensity
Contract invalidation risk
Access Options
Tailored to Your Team
Pricing reflects scope, seats, and integration requirements. All tiers include full platform access and traceable chronology tools.
Individual analyst access with full platform capabilities
- Full chronology builder
- Unlimited Time Packs
- All export formats
- Evidence mapping
- Provenance audit log
Team subscription for disputes and risk groups
- Up to 6 seats
- Collaborative workspaces
- API integration
- Custom templates
- Priority support
- Team audit trails
Full deployment with dedicated resources
- 10+ seats (expandable)
- Custom connectors
- Dedicated onboarding
- Bespoke export formats
- Deployment flexibility
- SLA arrangements
Want to see the platform first?
Secure Your 2026 Compliance Position
Greenland and Venezuela search terms are projected to surge in 2026. Position your team with forensic diagnostics infrastructure before the regulatory landscape shifts.
Not ready for a review?
Get forensic framework updates as regulations evolve.
Subscribe to Intelligence Updates
Receive weekly briefings on Arctic sovereignty developments and high-impact catalyst alerts.